The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution and Mr. Trump
There have been many assertions that President Trump's investments and holdings (both domestic and international) violate the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next >>
How to End the Threat of Radical Jihadists
Islam presents a fundamental confrontation to the rest of the world.
Radical jihadists will not cease until this fundamental confrontation is resolved.
For 1400 years, the disciples of Allah, with Mohamed as his messenger, have waged religious war against the world's non-Muslims, the infidels - those who do not accept Allah as the only true God and do not worship him as Mohamed proscribes (note that this does not include groups such as the Somali pirates who are fundamentally opportunistic gangsters preying on a local region). Notwithstanding that Allah is supposedly the same god as the Judaeo-Christian God. Even Moses and Jesus are accepted by Islam as prophets of Allah. Yet, violent disciples have rent Allah from the faith of Jews and Christians and placed their Allah in competition with all other deities.
Despite the supposed synonymous nature of Allah and the Judaeo-Christian God, Allah’s disciples have positioned themselves to fight for superiority of Allah. This HAS been a constant for 1400 years.
The only resolution will be to defeat the symbol of Allah, thus disproving the superiority of their Allah.
The most recognizable symbol of Allah is Mecca.
Nothing is going to stop violent jihad short of the destruction of Mecca, as a Muslim trust of Islam, to demonstrate and prove that Allah is not “SUPREME”. This does not require the physical annihilation of Mecca. Making Mecca an open city with infidels able to go and come freely is enough. The degree of force necessary to do this is a direct function of the resistance posed by Allah’s disciples; surely peaceful Muslims would not raise arms to prevent infidels from seeing Mecca’s interior.
It is possible that Muslim leaders, if presented with this possibility as a credible threat, could stop further violence. But, once presented, there would have to be the resolve to carry through. To back down after making the threat would signify surrender to the extremists and give them free reign to terrorize.
The possible ramifications would include a global Muslim retaliation – but this should not occur if Muslims are truly peaceful, having only been shown that Allah has feet of clay. It is implicit that if our society is open to Islam, Islam SHOULD be open to the rest of the world.
Undeniably, this is a bitter pill to solve the 1400 years of aggression by the disciples of Allah. But, it is the medicine that the West has refused to employ to rid the scourge of Muslim violence for those same 1400 years.
The solution to Muslim violence is to demonstrate that Allah is NOT supreme. Once shown, there is no longer an ideological imperative to impose the faith in Allah, as delivered by his Messenger Mohamed, peace be upon his name.
ALL subscribe/unsubscribe requests must be confirmed via email.
The ramblings of an old coot who knows that no one is going to pay any attention to what he says. But, say it he will because when it`s too late, people will say, `why didn`t you tell us, why didn`t you say something` and I can say, `I did, you didn`t listen`
So, these will be the warnings of one too old for you to hear, too resolute for you to heed. It will be easy to ignore me. You`ll say that I`m a racist or a bigot, a redneck or a right wing extremist, just don`t say that I didn`t warn you.